Reforming the Acquisition Process: View from the trenches
Started by Guest Vern Edwards · Jul 12, 2012 · 2 replies
- GOriginal post
Guest Vern Edwards
Jul 12, 2012 · 13y ago
Federal Times published an interesting opinion piece on July 7, entitled, "Time for DOD to Untangle Buying Process," by Joe Bednar, a CO with the Defense Logistics Agency.
http://www.federalti...-buying-process
He begins:
Dear Defense Department acquisitions bureaucracy: enough already. Please stop expanding the already monstrous labyrinth of buying procedures.
He recommends having "a few capable contracting people from the front lines" be given the job of rewriting the FAR... essential buying procedures" and eliminating supplements. His heart is in the right place.
(Thanks to Jim Nagle of Oles Morrison Rinker & Baker LLP of Seattle for bringing the article to my attention. Jim is one of the authors, along with Ralph Nash and John Cibinic, of Administration of Government Contracts 4th ed.)
- D
Desparado
Jul 12, 2012 · 13y ago
I would love the supplements to disappear. As someone who has transferred agencies a couple of times, learning that agency's supplement can be a pain. However, is that feasible? With specific language going into DoD appropriations, or VA, or whoever, it is possible to get rid of the supplements?
- G
Guest Vern Edwards
Jul 12, 2012 · 13y ago
Not for DOD.