Are you kidding me?

Started by Guest Vern Edwards · Jun 21, 2013 · 2 replies

  1. G

    Guest Vern Edwards

    Jun 21, 2013 · 12y ago

    Original post

    If you want a sign of what's wrong with acquisition, see Federal Acquisition Circular 2005-67, published today, Item VI, "Federal Acquisition Regulation; Price Analysis Techniques." The FAR councils take two and one-half pages to explain why they amended FAR 15.404-1( b )(2)(i) to change a reference from "15.403-1( c )(1)" to "15.403-1( c )(1)(i)." That's right, they added "(i)." That's it.

    Round of applause, everybody! The government is going to pay better prices from now on! (Now read the recent GSA IG report about improper intervention by GSA managers in negotiations for Multiple Award Schedule contracts. http://www.gsaig.gov/?LinkServID=A6466340-F829-EFFC-E9457DED4C509DB0&showMeta=0.)

    Meanwhile, the obscurity of the late proposal rule in FAR 15.208 and 52.215-1 with respect to late electronic proposals has been prompting protests to the Court of Federal Claims. There is so much uncertainty about the proper interpretation of the rule some contracting offices and individual COs will not allow the submission of electronic proposals. Yet, there is no FAR case to make a much needed fix.

    Stupid.

  2. h

    here_2_help

    Jun 24, 2013 · 12y ago

    Vern,

    You act like you are surprised.

    Surely this is simply the latest in a string of similar regulatory revisions by the DAR Council and other members of the FAR Councils?

    And by "similar" I mean "similarly stupid."

    H2H

  3. N

    NoNonsenseKO

    Jun 28, 2013 · 12y ago

    Vern,

    If you think that is bad you should read DHS Acquisition Alert 13-12 "Measuring and Reporting Cost Savings"

Sign in or sign up to post a reply.