Posting RFP Documents to Third Party Websites

I've seen this practice many times before. I'm not aware of what the objection from a potential offeror would be if the solicitation posting on FBO used the proper NAICS code, the description was reasonable, and the solicitation posting is properly linked to any earlier synopsis. See FAR 5.102 generally.

Those are my thoughts too. I just wanted to see if there were any decisions I could use to further make my point to an upset business concern.

I would look to cases citing to FAR 5.201 or 5.207©. To me, the key is less with the contents on the solicitation and more with the contents of the synopsis. If your synopsis met all the content requirements in FAR 5.207, and the solicitation was properly linked to the synopsis, then it seems the disappointed offeror had a reasonable opportunity to respond to the RFP, which appears to be the standard laid out in TMI Mgmt Systems, Inc., B-401530, Sept. 28, 2009, excerpted at wifcon.com/pd5_2.htm. If the solicitation posting used the correct NAICS, it is properly linked to a synopsis that contained everything required under Part 5, and the summary on FBO was not misleading, then a reasonable potential offeror would have taken the time to follow the link.