IDIQ Ordering Period_Task Order Management

Factors that will affect an answer include whether you're talking supplies or services, whether the requirement is severable, the color of money (O&M, RDT&E, Milcon...), and so forth.

Assume you have no constraints or nuance of any type, can do whatever you like here, and are simply choosing between 

a) New order for CY2, or

b) Mod existing order to add funds for CY2.

Then I think a) is the better practice.  Its simpler. The documentation is cleaner and easier to follow.  Doing a mod, perhaps to avoid the paperwork involved in issuing a new order, is adding complexity.   And that's something to avoid. 

Of course, there is no such thing as "no constraints."  The most obvious one is what you referenced - Severable services contracts obligating appropriated funds cannot have a PoP exceeding one year.

General.Zhukov said:

Severable services contracts obligating appropriated funds cannot have a PoP exceeding one year.

Just add an additional line item to the order for the follow-on year.

Vern Edwards said:

Just add an additional line item to the order for the follow-on year.

Yes, this is correct.  Even easier than a new (but functionally identical) order is adding a line item to an existing order via option exercise.

General.Zhukov said:

Even easier than a new (but functionally identical) order is adding a line item to an existing order via option exercise.

The way I read the OP's question, there is no option to be exercised.

Correct. No options to be exercised, just one 5 year ordering period. Contract is mainly for services.  There are actually 2 IDIQS and the CO in both cases is planning to mod the task orders to extend for  CY 2, add funding etc.  It doesn't seem clean to me but the Program folks prefer it this way.

On 1/26/2022 at 12:05 PM, Pathforward said:

No options to be exercised, just one 5 year ordering period

It is possible to have just a five year ordering period for the IDIQ and options (to be exercised via modification) in the individual task orders. The original question says the IDIQ doesn't have options but never fully clarifies whether the task orders might. If the actual work to be performed is negotiated at the task order level then negotiating an entirely new task order each year may be impractical compared to putting options in the task order for future years of the requirement defined and priced in the task order. Alternately if the IDIQ has a fully defined requirement and unit prices then maybe issuing a new task order each year isn't much of a burden.

Thank you. No, there are no options in the task orders. Yes, to me issuing new task orders for the new contract year is cleaner and not a burden but others do not think that way. Appreciate the comments.